When Stephen Hawking declared God unnecessary for the universe’s existence, he sparked fierce debate across scientific and philosophical communities. The renowned physicist claimed that physics alone could explain everything, making a creator redundant. Yet many brilliant minds, from fellow scientists to philosophers and theologians, remain unconvinced. These thinkers have developed fascinating counterarguments that challenge Hawking’s conclusions on multiple fronts, suggesting the conversation about God’s existence is far from closed.
John Lennox

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
This Oxford mathematician takes issue with Hawking’s fundamental premise. Lennox points out that physical laws describe reality but don’t create it, like a recipe can’t bake itself into a cake. His book “God and Stephen Hawking” tackles this head-on. Laws of nature require explanation for their existence, and Lennox argues a mind behind the universe makes more logical sense than self-causing physics.
William Lane Craig

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Craig exposes a sleight-of-hand in Hawking’s “universe from nothing” argument. The famed philosopher notes that Hawking’s “nothing” actually contains quantum laws and properties, hardly true nothingness. This undermines the entire premise. Craig’s Kalam cosmological argument counters Hawking directly. Something that begins to exist needs a cause, and the universe began to exist. This simple logic remains powerful.
Roger Penrose

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Hawking’s own collaborator questions the scientific foundation of his God-rejecting conclusions. Penrose points out that M-theory, which Hawking used to explain a self-creating universe, lacks empirical support. It remains mathematical conjecture, not proven fact. Penrose suggests alternative cosmological models that don’t eliminate the possibility of a creator. His scientific credentials add weight to this critique.
Alister McGrath

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
McGrath identifies Hawking’s category mistake, jumping from science to metaphysics without acknowledging the leap. Science describes mechanisms but can’t answer ultimate “why” questions. A former scientist himself, McGrath argues in “The Dawkins Delusion?” that Hawking’s claim that physics eliminates God represents a philosophical stance, not a scientific conclusion. The distinction matters enormously for this debate.
Francis Collins

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
The leader of the Human Genome Project demonstrates that top-tier scientists can embrace both science and faith. Collins argues that Hawking sidesteps key human experiences like morality and meaning. His book “The Language of God” recounts his personal journey from atheism to belief. DNA’s complexity suggested design to Collins, something Hawking’s physics-only approach fails to address.
Richard Swinburne

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
This Oxford philosopher flips Hawking’s logic on its head. Swinburne argues that a single intelligent cause offers a simpler explanation than Hawking’s multiverse hypothesis. Using probability arguments in “The Existence of God,” he shows that a personal creator fits the evidence better than infinite unobservable universes. His focus on explanatory power challenges Hawking’s mathematical abstractions.
Thomas Aquinas

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Though separated by centuries, Aquinas’s “First Cause” argument remains relevant to Hawking’s claims. Modern scholars like Edward Feser note that even quantum origins require an uncaused starting point. Everything contingent needs a necessary cause. Aquinas’s medieval framework continues to trouble modern physicists who seek self-contained explanations for existence. His logic transcends technological advances.
Hugh Ross

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
This astrophysicist turns Hawking’s own discipline against him. Ross argues in “The Creator and the Cosmos” that universal fine-tuning strongly suggests intent rather than chance. Constants like gravitational force appear precisely calibrated for life. Hawking acknowledged this fine-tuning but proposed the multiverse as an explanation. Ross finds this an untestable dodge of compelling design evidence.
Robin Collins

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Collins calculates the mathematical improbability of life-permitting conditions arising randomly. His work “The Teleological Argument” shows that chance alone falls short. He argues Hawking’s infinite universes theory lacks empirical grounding and violates Occam’s razor—the principle that simpler explanations are preferable. His approach bridges philosophy and physics to challenge Hawking’s dismissal of design.
Keith Ward

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
This theologian attacks Hawking’s fundamental assumption of materialism. Ward contends in “God, Chance and Necessity” that physics might be a tool of divine mind rather than its replacement. Hawking never justifies why matter alone should be the ultimate explanation. Ward suggests Hawking’s rejection of God assumes what it claims to prove—a circular argument that weakens his case.
David Bentley Hart

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Hart exposes a crucial equivocation in Hawking’s reasoning. His book “The Experience of God” explains that Hawking’s “nothing” represents a physical state with potential—not absolute non-existence. This subtly shifts the goalposts. Theological questions address being itself, not just physical states. Hart’s Orthodox perspective adds depth to this critique. Hawking never addresses this deeper level of nothingness.
Edward Feser

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Feser accuses Hawking of philosophical naiveté. In “The Last Superstition,” he shows how Hawking ignores classical metaphysics like Aristotle’s unmoved mover. Physics presupposes change and motion, which require a first cause. Hawking’s dismissal of God reveals his unfamiliarity with pre-modern philosophy. Feser’s neo-Scholastic approach directly confronts the assumptions underlying Hawking’s claims.
Alvin Plantinga

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
This legendary philosopher attacks Hawking’s naturalism as self-defeating. Plantinga argues in “Where the Conflict Really Lies” that evolution alone cannot guarantee reliable human reasoning. If our minds evolved only for survival, not truth, why trust our scientific conclusions? Theism better explains cognitive reliability. This undercuts the foundation of Hawking’s materialism, turning science against itself.
Dinesh D’Souza

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
D’Souza popularizes a straightforward critique in “What’s So Great About Christianity.” Hawking’s laws still require an origin. What explains the existence of gravity itself? D’Souza accuses Hawking of scientism—overextending scientific authority into theological domains. His accessible style has spread this critique widely. The basic question remains: why do these particular laws exist at all?
Paul Davies

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Though not theistic himself, this physicist questions whether laws of physics can explain their own existence. Davies explores in “The Mind of God” how physical laws might require a deeper framework. He finds Hawking’s self-contained universe unsatisfying without further justification. His agnostic stance weakens Hawking’s certainty. Even fellow scientists find gaps in Hawking’s comprehensive claims.
The Kalam Cosmological Argument

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
This simple argument persists against Hawking’s complexity. Anything that begins to exist needs a cause. The universe began to exist. Therefore, the universe needs a cause. Defenders note that Hawking’s quantum models still imply a temporal beginning. This necessitates an external, timeless cause—aligning perfectly with theism. The argument’s elegance stands against Hawking’s theoretical gymnastics.
Leibniz’s Contingency Argument

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Modern defenders ask the question Hawking sidesteps: why is there something rather than nothing? Philosophers like Alexander Pruss argue that contingent realities need a necessary being to exist. Hawking’s physics describes contingency but doesn’t explain it. This classic argument challenges materialist cosmologies. The universe’s existence remains mysterious without a necessary foundation.
Gary Habermas

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Habermas approaches from a different angle—historical evidence. He argues in “The Case for the Resurrection” that Hawking ignores empirical data suggesting supernatural events. His compilation of historical facts about Jesus’s resurrection falls outside Hawking’s scope. This critique highlights the limits of physics in addressing all forms of evidence. History provides its own data requiring explanation.
J.P. Moreland

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Moreland targets Hawking’s blindspot—consciousness. In “Consciousness and the Existence of God,” he argues that subjective experience defies materialist reduction. Our inner lives suggest reality includes more than particles. Hawking never adequately explains how matter produces mind. Moreland challenges physicists to account for these phenomena without a mind behind them. This gap remains unbridged.
Stephen Meyer

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Meyer turns the empirical tables on Hawking. In “Return of the God Hypothesis,” he argues that biological complexity and cosmic fine-tuning favor design over chance. He criticizes Hawking’s speculative multiverse as lacking the empirical rigor Meyer finds in design arguments. His background in science history strengthens this case. The evidence for design appears more direct than Hawking’s theoretical alternatives.
Norman Geisler

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
This theologian identifies Hawking’s category error. Geisler argues in “Christian Apologetics” that “how” questions differ fundamentally from “why” questions. Hawking conflates these categories. Physics describes mechanisms but can’t address purpose. Geisler defends a first cause as logically necessary, beyond Hawking’s models. His systematic approach challenges the scope of physical explanations.
Ravi Zacharias

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Zacharias targeted Hawking’s existential emptiness. He argued in “The Real Face of Atheism” that Hawking’s universe offers no meaning, contradicting human experience. A universe without purpose fails to account for our sense of value and destiny. Zacharias contrasted this with theism’s rich narrative of meaning. His global ministry amplified this critique. Hawking’s physics leaves the human heart unanswered.
Michael Behe

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
This biochemist shifts focus to life itself. Behe challenges Hawking’s materialism with evidence of irreducible complexity in biology. “Darwin’s Black Box” details systems like bacterial flagella that suggest design. Hawking largely ignored life’s origins in his cosmic theories. Behe’s work moves the debate from physics to biology. Complex biological machinery points to intelligence beyond random processes.
The Anthropic Principle

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Many scientists note the universe’s suspicious habitability. Proponents like John Barrow highlight precise constants enabling life. The odds against this happening by chance appear astronomical. Hawking acknowledged this fine-tuning but proposed the multiverse to explain it. Critics find this less convincing than design. The precision enabling our existence seems to demand explanation beyond coincidence.
Tim Keller

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
This influential pastor addresses Hawking’s dismissal of human spiritual instincts. Keller argues in “The Reason for God” that the universe’s order suggests a relational intelligence behind mechanics. Our innate sense of purpose and morality point to something beyond particles. Keller’s pastoral approach widens the critique’s appeal. Hawking’s theories feel incomplete against the fullness of human experience.
Ian Hutchinson

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
This MIT physicist identifies Hawking’s scientism—the belief that science alone answers all questions. Hutchinson argues in “Monopolizing Knowledge” that Hawking overextends physics into philosophy. Science excels at “how” questions but stumbles on “why” questions. Hutchinson defends multiple domains of truth beyond physics. His scientific credentials add weight to this critique of Hawking’s overreach.
Dallas Willard

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Willard exposed Hawking’s unproven naturalistic assumptions. The philosopher argued in “The Divine Conspiracy” that reality includes non-physical dimensions like spirit, which Hawking ignored. Willard challenged the coherence of a purely material cosmos. His focus on knowledge theory deepened this critique. Hawking’s framework remains incomplete without addressing these aspects of reality.
Greg Koukl

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
This apologist identifies Hawking’s logical leap from description to ontology. Koukl argues in “Tactics” that explaining how the universe works doesn’t eliminate the why behind it. Hawking begs the question against theism rather than disproving it. His practical approach makes this criticism accessible. The gap between mechanism and purpose remains unbridged in Hawking’s work.
Philosophical Theism

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Broad philosophical traditions challenge Hawking’s materialism. Thinkers like Brian Leftow argue that abstract entities such as mathematical laws suggest a mind, not just matter. Hawking’s models lack ultimate explanation for these abstractions. The existence of immaterial truths troubles purely physical accounts of reality. This tradition directly confronts the limitations of Hawking’s framework.
Scientific Skeptics of Multiverse

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Some physicists question Hawking’s alternative to God. Sabine Hossenfelder calls the multiverse a “mathematical fantasy” in “Lost in Math,” not science. It lacks empirical evidence and testability. This undermines Hawking’s main alternative to theism as equally unprovable. Her critique comes from scientific rigor, not religious commitment. Hawking’s speculative physics faces criticism from within science itself.
C.S. Lewis

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Lewis’s argument from reason continues to challenge Hawking’s materialism. In “Miracles,” Lewis argued that rational thought cannot arise from non-rational processes, as Hawking’s view implies. If our minds resulted from mindless forces, why trust their conclusions? Modern defenders apply this to question Hawking’s worldview. This paradox remains unresolved in materialist accounts of mind.
Robert Spitzer

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
This physicist-priest focuses on entropy. Spitzer argues in “New Proofs for the Existence of God” that the universe’s low entropy state suggests a purposeful beginning. Random processes tend toward disorder, not the precise order we observe. He finds Hawking’s quantum fluctuations insufficient explanations. His dual expertise in science and theology strengthens this challenge to Hawking’s randomness.
Conclusion

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
The pushback against Hawking’s dismissal of God comes from diverse intellectual traditions and disciplines. These critics expose gaps in his reasoning, from definitional problems to empirical shortcomings. The debate continues because Hawking’s physics, however brilliant, leaves fundamental questions unanswered. Perhaps the most compelling insight is that science and faith address different but complementary aspects of reality. The conversation remains far from settled.
The new tariffs signed by President Trump in March 2025 will soon hit your wallet if you’re shopping for a new car. With a 25% levy on imported vehicles and parts from countries including Canada and Mexico, plus a 20% tariff on Chinese goods, nearly half of all cars sold in the US face price increases. These hikes will roll out as dealers deplete their pre-tariff inventory, likely becoming widespread by July.
Audi: German Engineering at a Premium Plus

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Every Audi in American showrooms comes from abroad, mainly Germany and Mexico. The popular Q5 SUV from Mexico could jump $5,000-$10,000. German-made A4 and A6 sedans will see similar increases. For luxury shoppers, Audi’s complete dependence on foreign plants means sticker shock across their entire lineup. This reality might push buyers toward American alternatives or send them hunting in the used market for better values.
BMW: Half-Protected by South Carolina

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
The Bavarian automaker finds itself in a mixed position. About 50% of BMWs sold in America come from overseas plants. Mexico-built 3 Series and 2 Series Coupes will cost $4,000-$8,000 more after tariffs. German-made models like the M3 could jump $10,000. Yet BMW fans might find relief with the Spartanburg-built X-series SUVs, which should maintain stable pricing. These American-made BMWs suddenly look like smart buys compared to their imported siblings.
Chevrolet: Mexico-Built Models Taking a Hit

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Despite strong US manufacturing roots, GM imports roughly 750,000 vehicles yearly from Mexico and Canada. You’ll pay $3,000-$6,000 more for Mexico-made Blazer and Equinox crossovers. The South Korean Trax might jump $4,000 too. While GM could eventually shift production stateside, that won’t happen overnight. Until then, Chevy’s affordable models will cost substantially more, squeezing budget-conscious buyers who thought they could afford a new Chevrolet.
Dodge: Canadian Muscle Cars Getting Pricier

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Muscle car fans won’t escape the tariff pain. Stellantis sources numerous vehicles from Canada and Mexico. The iconic Charger, proudly built in Brampton, Canada, faces a $5,000-$7,000 increase. Durango SUV prices will climb similarly. Though Dodge assembles 60% of US-sold cars domestically, these vehicles heavily depend on imported parts. Working-class enthusiasts might find themselves priced out of their dream cars unless Stellantis quickly adjusts its supply chains.
Ferrari: Italian Thoroughbreds Cost Even More

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Ferrari ships every model from Italy, putting them squarely in the tariff’s path. Expect the 296, SF90, and Roma to command an extra $10,000-$15,000 beyond their already astronomical prices. Will the ultra-wealthy Ferrari buyers even notice? Probably not. But dealerships might see fewer sales overall as these exclusive cars become even more exclusive. The Italian brand perfectly demonstrates how luxury imports face some of the steepest dollar increases.
Ford: Blue Oval’s Mexican Models Face Increases

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
America’s automotive icon builds 78% of its US-sold vehicles domestically, yet its Mexican-built models will feel the tariff pinch. The affordable Maverick and Bronco Sport from Hermosillo will cost $3,000-$6,000 more. The electric Mustang Mach-E could jump $5,000. Interestingly, while the F-150 largely escapes direct tariffs, its Canadian-sourced engines will still push prices up slightly. This mixed exposure creates pricing inconsistencies across Ford’s otherwise American-focused lineup.
Honda: Canadian and Japanese Imports Cost More

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
The reliability king can’t escape tariff troubles. Despite significant US production, Honda faces price hikes on several popular models. The best-selling CR-V from Canada could cost $4,000-$6,000 more. The Civic Sedan from Canada and Japan faces similar increases. Honda’s sterling reputation might keep buyers loyal despite higher prices. But many shoppers will likely consider used alternatives or competitors with higher US content as the math changes dramatically for new purchases.
Hyundai: Korean Value Proposition Weakens

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Hyundai built its American success on value, but tariffs threaten this formula. Over 60% of their US sales come from imported vehicles, even with their Georgia plant running full-tilt. Korean-built Elantra and Venue models face $4,000-$5,000 increases. Such jumps hurt most on entry-level models where price sensitivity runs highest. Though future EV production in Georgia might eventually help, current shoppers will find Hyundai’s value proposition significantly diminished on most models.
Jaguar: British Luxury Becomes More Exclusive

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
The leaping cat brand imports everything. Jaguar’s entire lineup comes from the UK and Slovakia, with the F-Pace their only 2025 model. Expect it to cost $5,000-$10,000 more after tariffs take effect. For a brand already struggling with a small US market share, higher prices could further reduce its footprint. Some luxury buyers might absorb these increases without complaint, while others will likely cross-shop against domestic luxury alternatives offering more stable pricing.
Jeep: Rugged Appeal Meets Higher Prices

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Off-road enthusiasts face a rougher financial trail ahead. Jeep’s production spans multiple countries with significant Mexico and Canada exposure. The Compass, assembled in Toluca, Mexico, will set you back $4,000-$6,000 more. Even the upcoming Wagoneer S electric vehicle faces similar increases before its launch. Though Jeep commands strong brand loyalty, its smaller, more affordable models will struggle to maintain their appeal as prices climb substantially across the lineup.
Kia: Budget-Friendly Image Takes a Hit

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Kia’s reputation for smart value faces serious challenges. The brand relies heavily on imports from South Korea and Mexico despite producing the Telluride stateside. Their new K4 compact from Mexico will cost $4,000-$5,000 more after tariffs. The Soul and Seltos from South Korea face identical increases. Shoppers seeking affordability will find Kia less compelling, though their US-built EVs like the EV9 remain somewhat insulated from the worst tariff effects.
Lamborghini: Exclusive Gets More Exclusive

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
For the ultra-wealthy, Lamborghini prices will climb higher still. All models ship from Italy, making them fully exposed to tariffs. The Urus SUV and Huracán supercar will command $10,000-$15,000 more. Will Lamborghini’s customer base even flinch? Probably not much. Yet sales volumes could still decline slightly as these already expensive vehicles push even further into the stratosphere. The supercar segment demonstrates how luxury brands face the largest dollar increases.
Land Rover: British Off-Roaders Cost More

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Adventure-seeking luxury buyers will pay premium prices for their exploration vehicles. Land Rover imports 100% of its lineup from the UK and Slovakia. The rugged Defender will cost $5,000-$10,000 more after tariffs. The Range Rover faces identical increases. The brand’s unique positioning might help some buyers justify these hikes, but Land Rover’s already niche US market presence could shrink further as prices climb beyond what even affluent shoppers consider reasonable.
Mazda: Zoom-Zoom Prices Zoom Upward

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Mazda’s driver-focused vehicles will command higher prices soon. With over 60% of US models coming from Mexico and Japan, the brand faces widespread increases. Their top sellers (the CX-5 SUV and Mazda3 from Mexico) will cost $4,000-$6,000 more. The beloved Miata sports car from Japan faces similar jumps. Mazda has always balanced driving pleasure with reasonable prices, but these increases threaten that equation, especially for enthusiast models that already occupy narrow market segments.
Mercedes-Benz: Star Power Costs More

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
The three-pointed star will shine more expensively after tariffs. About half of Mercedes vehicles come from Germany and Mexico, though Alabama builds some SUVs. The GLB compact SUV from Mexico will jump $4,000-$8,000. The C-Class Coupe from South Africa might cost $10,000 more. While Mercedes’ luxury status might cushion some shock, even Alabama-built models will cost more due to imported components. This creates a complex pricing landscape across their extensive lineup.
Mini: British Charm at Premium Prices

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Small cars face big price increases. Every Mini sold stateside arrives from the UK or Germany. The Cooper will cost $4,000-$6,000 more after tariffs. The larger Countryman faces equivalent increases. Mini has always commanded premium prices for small cars based on their unique character. These hikes make their value proposition even more questionable. Many buyers might reconsider domestic alternatives that avoid tariffs altogether for similar city-friendly transportation.
Nissan: Budget Models Become Less Affordable

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Value-conscious shoppers will feel this pinch acutely. Despite some US manufacturing, Nissan relies heavily on Mexican production. Their budget models (Sentra, Versa, and Kicks) will jump $3,000-$5,000. The Ariya EV from Japan faces comparable increases. For entry-level vehicles, these hikes represent substantial percentage increases that fundamentally change their market position. Budget buyers will likely turn to used vehicles or hold their current cars longer rather than absorb these increases.
Porsche: Performance Premium Gets Pricier

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
The sports car icon faces across-the-board increases. Porsche imports everything from Germany and Slovakia. The popular Cayenne SUV will jump $5,000-$10,000 after tariffs. The iconic 911 sports car faces similar increases. While affluent Porsche enthusiasts might absorb these costs without much complaint, the brand could still see declining sales in what has become an increasingly competitive luxury performance segment where domestic alternatives suddenly look relatively more appealing.
Ram: Work Trucks Work Harder on Budgets

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Contractors and businesses face higher equipment costs. Ram depends heavily on Mexican plants for pickups and vans. Their Heavy Duty pickups will cost $5,000-$10,000 more after tariffs. The ProMaster commercial van will see similar jumps. These increases hit particularly hard for commercial customers who factor vehicle costs into their business operations. Many will delay fleet replacements or seek used alternatives rather than absorb these substantial price increases.
Subaru: Japanese Imports Face Steep Hikes

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
The adventure-ready brand can’t escape tariff impact. Subaru imports most models from Japan despite building the Outback and Legacy stateside. The popular Forester SUV will cost $4,000-$6,000 more. The BRZ sports car faces identical increases. While Subaru commands one of the most loyal customer bases in the industry, even die-hard fans might hesitate at these new prices. First-time Subaru shoppers will find the brand’s value proposition significantly weakened across most models.
Toyota: Reliable Favorites Cost More

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
America’s reliability champion faces widespread price increases. Despite substantial US production, Toyota imports many models from various countries. The Tacoma pickup from Mexico will jump $5,000-$7,000. The popular RAV4 Hybrid from Canada faces similar hikes. Toyota’s legendary durability might keep some buyers loyal despite higher prices. However, their core models will see substantial increases that could drive many consumers toward the used market or competing brands with more US content.
Volkswagen: People’s Cars Less for the People

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
The German brand’s American comeback faces serious headwinds. VW imports over 60% of US-sold vehicles from Mexico and Germany despite its Tennessee facility. The Jetta, Tiguan, and Taos from Puebla, Mexico, will cost $3,000-$6,000 more. Some Chinese-built models could jump $5,000-$10,000. VW’s recent push for greater affordability in the American market now stalls as prices climb substantially. Buyers seeking German engineering at reasonable prices will find far fewer options.
Volvo: Swedish Safety at a Premium

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
Safety-conscious families will pay more for their peace of mind. Volvo imports over 60% of US models from China and Sweden, though their South Carolina plant provides some buffer. The S90 sedan from China will cost $5,000-$10,000 more. The XC40 compact SUV from Belgium faces equivalent increases. While Volvo’s safety-focused buyers tend to be less price-sensitive, their imported models will become significantly less competitive. This could accelerate the brand’s shift toward US production in the coming years.
What This Means for Car Buyers

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
These price hikes will arrive gradually as dealers sell through their pre-tariff inventory. By July, expect most imported models to carry significantly higher stickers. American-built vehicles from Tesla, Rivian, and Lucid should maintain stable pricing, potentially gaining market share. Used car prices will likely climb too as more shoppers seek alternatives to newly expensive imports. For the best deals, consider brands with significant US production or purchase sooner rather than later, before tariffs fully impact dealer stock.